Key Points:
- Novak Djokovic is officially leaving the Professional Tennis Players Association, which he helped launch.
- He cited ongoing disagreements over transparency, governance, and strategic direction within the group.
- The move comes just weeks before the 2026 season kicks off, with implications for player representation in tennis.
Novak Djokovic announced his decision to step away from the Professional Tennis Players Association, an organization he co-founded to give players more influence over the sport’s governance. The Serbian star said he feels the union’s current direction no longer aligns with his personal values and long-term vision for tennis.
The Professional Tennis Players Association, often referred to as the PTPA, was launched with the promise of strengthening players’ collective voice. Djokovic and fellow co-founder Vasek Pospisil sought to create a group that could represent athletes’ interests independently of tournament bodies and governing organizations.
Despite helping establish the PTPA, Djokovic said he increasingly found himself at odds with how the group operates. He expressed concern about internal transparency and decision-making processes. According to Djokovic, these differences became too significant to ignore, prompting his departure.
In a message posted on social media, Djokovic explained that his decision reflects a desire to focus more on his personal career, family, and contributions to tennis outside of union leadership. He emphasized that his split should not be interpreted as a rejection of player representation.
The 38-year-old, widely regarded as one of the greatest tennis players of all time, said he remains committed to supporting his fellow athletes. However, he believes that other platforms or approaches may better serve players’ interests going forward. Djokovic did not rule out future involvement in advocacy, just not within the current PTPA framework.
The PTPA’s leadership acknowledged Djokovic’s exit in a statement. The group said it respects his decision and remains dedicated to representing the interests of professional tennis players. Officials reiterated their commitment to transparent governance, collective bargaining, and increased opportunities for athlete input.
Djokovic’s departure comes at a pivotal time for the organization. The PTPA made headlines in 2025 by filing a major lawsuit against the sport’s key governing bodies, including the ATP, WTA, and International Tennis Federation. The lawsuit accused these institutions of anti-competitive conduct and called for systemic reform.
While Djokovic supported the idea of stronger player influence, he did not always agree with the legal strategy pursued by the PTPA. Reports suggested behind-the-scenes differences over the lawsuit and broader organizational direction. These tensions appear to have contributed to his decision to step back.
Supporters of the PTPA argue that the union remains a critical voice for players, especially in negotiations over prize money, scheduling, and health protocols. They say Djokovic’s departure is personal and does not diminish the group’s mission. The PTPA believes it can continue building momentum with or without him.
Analysts say Djokovic’s exit highlights challenges facing athlete-led unions in individual sports like tennis. Balancing star power with collective representation is complex, and differing priorities among players can test organizational unity. The PTPA’s future strategy may evolve as it adapts to new leadership dynamics.
With the 2026 season approaching, Djokovic will turn his attention back to competition. Fans and commentators will watch how his relationship with the PTPA unfolds in upcoming tournaments. Meanwhile, the organization prepares to continue its efforts to reshape player influence in professional tennis.
